It is obvious that Canada is not the number one story in the news anymore as all eyes have been shifted to the Ukraine/Russia situation.
Of course, that is the news and we should be aware of what is going on all over the place, but we cannot allow that to be a distraction.
Many people have theorized that the COVID-19 pandemic was just a practice round for the elite to see just how hard it would be to shut down the world.
Sadly, we all failed that test since the majority of Americans and other countries rolled over and should their belly with hardly any fight.
Now, that the restrictions have been loosening up and the focus has been shifted to Ukraine and Russia it seems that the global elite is making their move.
Everyone is distracted.
(Let me preface this by saying, I am not saying that we should all not pray for those who are being harmed in the fighting, but just saying we need to keep vigilant.)
For example, the WHO is attempting to get nations to agree to a Global Pandemic Treaty for a pre-established global response to the next “pandemic.”
For participating countries, this global binding agreement would override their nation’s constitution and pandemic response strategies.
Thus, it establishes a pre-determined global response to any “pandemic.”
The WHO published this news release in December 2021:
In a consensus decision aimed at protecting the world from future infectious diseases crises, the World Health Assembly today agreed to kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said the decision by the World Health Assembly was historic in nature, vital in its mission, and represented a once-in-a-generation opportunity to strengthen the global health architecture to protect and promote the well-being of all people.
“The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a light on the many flaws in the global system to protect people from pandemics: the most vulnerable people going without vaccines; health workers without needed equipment to perform their life-saving work; and ‘me-first’ approaches that stymie the global solidarity needed to deal with a global threat,” Dr Tedros said.
“But at the same time, we have seen inspiring demonstrations of scientific and political collaboration, from the rapid development of vaccines, to today’s commitment by countries to negotiate a global accord that will help to keep future generations safer from the impacts of pandemics.”
The Health Assembly met in a Special Session, the second-ever since WHO’s founding in 1948, and adopted a sole decision titled: “The World Together.” The decision by the Assembly establishes an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, with a view to adoption under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, or other provisions of the Constitution as may be deemed appropriate by the INB.
Article 19 of the WHO Constitution provides the World Health Assembly with the authority to adopt conventions or agreements on any matter within WHO’s competence. The sole instrument established under Article 19 to date is the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which has made a significant and rapid contribution to protecting people from tobacco since its entry into force in 2005.
Under the decision adopted today, the INB will hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 1 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft). It will also hold public hearings to inform its deliberations; deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023; and submit its outcome for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.
Through the decision, the World Health Assembly also requested the WHO Director-General to convene the INB meetings and support its work, including by facilitating the participation of other United Nations system bodies, non-state actors, and other relevant stakeholders in the process to the extent decided by the INB.
This brings me to this post by one of my favorite profiles that caught my attention, and naturally, I had to investigate further:
If you are not following shotsbyhill on Instagram yet, please check him out!
These three proposed pieces of legislation would destroy fundamental freedoms in Canada and nobody is talking about them.
Bill C-11 (First Reading February 2, 2022):
An Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act
Bill C-11 would create unprecedented levels of censorship in Canada.
REMINDER: Bill C-10 has been reintroduced as Bill C-11 by the Trudeau government
It puts the CRTC in charge of deciding what you can see & hear on the internet
Do you trust the feds to decide what podcasts & shows you choose?
— Kris Sims (@kris_sims) February 15, 2022
Bill C-36 (First Reading June 23, 2021):
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to create a recognizance to keep the peace relating to hate propaganda and hate crime and to define “hatred” for the purposes of two hate propaganda offences. It also makes related amendments to the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
In addition, it amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to provide that it is a discriminatory practice to communicate or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the Internet or other means of telecommunication in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. It authorizes the Canadian Human Rights Commission to accept complaints alleging this discriminatory practice and authorizes the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to adjudicate complaints and order remedies.
Another good title for this legislation is the Minority Report Bill. If the government suspects you of hate speech, then Bill C-36 grants them authority to take action.
Bill S-233 (First Reading December 16, 2021):
This enactment requires the Minister of Finance to develop a national framework to provide all persons over the age of 17 in Canada with access to a guaranteed livable basic income. It also provides for reporting requirements with respect to the framework.
COMMUNISM IN CANADA! "Conspiracy Theory"?
BILL S-233 UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME with "standardized health requirements" this is the Chinese social credit system.
No jab. No welfare. And the vast majority of you wont be able to survive without "government assistance." pic.twitter.com/VXhBF5tUeK
— Canadian Cryptonaire – Passionate about Freedom! (@CCryptonaire) February 26, 2022
Canada currently has a Universal Basic Income bill in the House of Commons
Bill S-233 has already been tabled and passed a second reading…
This bill would guarantee a tax-payer funded annual income to all citizens over the age of 17 (including refugee claimants)?? pic.twitter.com/BEXjRmG9tO
— Jared Schumaier ?? (@strummaster42) February 28, 2022
Universal Basic Income (UBI) would establish the framework for a Chinese-Style Social Credit System on Canadian soil.
UBI will almost certainly attach to a digital ID and give the government power over every aspect of your life.
If you’re a dissident in the eyes of the regime, they can revoke access to your “income.”
- Online Censorship
- Thought Police
The Canadian Parliament is fast-tracking its people to the World Economic Forum agenda while the media squawks about Russia invading Ukraine.